Hulk delays

[Hoss]

Geez. It only took four issues to fall behind.

Hulk #2: February 20, 2008
Hulk #3: April 23, 2008
Hulk #4: June 25, 2008

As much as I have enjoyed the Hulk the last few months, I am seriously considering dropping this title. At least I can pick up back issues to fill the gaps in my collection.

:(

-

[jaydeebee]

Delays can kill a title faster than bad art and crappy writing. The worst thing that can happen to a title is for the reader's to get out of the habit of buying it.

[marvelguy]

Geez. It only took four issues to fall behind.

Hulk #2: February 20, 2008
Hulk #3: April 23, 2008
Hulk #4: June 25, 2008

As much as I have enjoyed the Hulk the last few months, I am seriously considering dropping this title. At least I can pick up back issues to fill the gaps in my collection.

:(

-

What the #*!! is going on? I thought Ed McG has a head start on the Hulk books since he signed exclusive back in 2006. I know he did a short story in Wolverine #50 and a few covers here and there but I think Ed has already finished the arc or maybe more. I think Marvel is stretching a hit book for every fiscal quarter to max out profits.

[guy ricketts]

Sounds like I might be better off just getting the collected trades - when those finally come out!
I hate having to wait more than the usual month or so to continue a storyline, especially the first storyline! :mad: Nothing kills the flow of a story more than long gaps between...:mad::mad: